5 Comments

  1. Have you more details of the “Treatise against Heretics”? Presumably it was a medeival document at the time of the Cathars? Thanks.

    1. My direct source for this is Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Magdalene.
      Medieval dualism
      The 13th-century Cistercian monk and chronicler Peter of Vaux de Cernay claimed it was part of Catharist belief that the earthly Jesus Christ had a relationship with Mary Magdalene, described as his concubine. Quote: “Further, in their secret meetings they said that the Christ who was born in the earthly and visible Bethlehem and crucified at Jerusalem was ‘evil’, and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine – and that she was the woman taken in adultery who is referred to in the Scriptures; the ‘good’ Christ, they said, neither ate nor drank nor assumed the true flesh and was never in this world, except spiritually in the body of Paul. I have used the term ‘the earthly and visible Bethlehem’ because the heretics believed there is a different and invisible earth in which – according to some of them – the ‘good’ Christ was born and crucified.”]

      A document, possibly written by Ermengaud of Béziers, undated and anonymous and attached to his Treatise against Heretics, makes a similar statement.

      Also they [the Cathars] teach in their secret meetings that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Christ. She was the Samaritan woman to whom He said, “Call thy husband.” She was the woman taken into adultery, whom Christ set free lest the Jews stone her, and she was with Him in three places, in the temple, at the well, and in the garden. After the Resurrection, He appeared first to her.

      1. Hey, you inspired me to crack open Jane Schaberg’s book – The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene. I am about half way thruogh and wow am I ever getting a different perspective than the one I got a few years ago. Perhaps I have matured a bit. What I am sensing is that she was alot more than the Da Vinci Code romance which so many women have glommed onto. She is much more than a lover of Jesus. Very interesting. I had dismissed xanity, but women searching the texts and finding other ways of seeing it is fascinating.

  2. Thanks, Melvis for bringing my attention to Jane Schaberg’s book. Despite considerable research on Mary Magdalene, I missed it. After checking it out on Amazon, it goes right to my reading list. The “editors” of the New Testament seem to have had a definite hidden agenda to keep MM as far from center stage as possible. Her resurrection comes none too soon. In my next novel, the one after The Perfect, I hope to delve into and develop her role in a way that contributes to her “coming out.”

  3. Vic, if you read The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene, let me know your impression. Sounds very interesting, but then it all is. Lauri

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.